Offline
Sam Morril - You've Changed
This special may not be quite as sharp as Morril's last two or three, but the jokes, focused on some of his less successful relationship encounters, do seem more mature than his earlier material, and show an evolution in style.
7.5/10
And some crowd work specifically for free
Offline
Joe Rogan - Burn the Boats
No signs of intelligent life here.
3/10
(Yes, I wrote that about 5 minutes into the special, but, trust me, it doesn't get any smarter.)
Offline
Honestly, I think the only laugh I got from the Joe Rogan special was the thought of the couple of dozen Rogan bros who will wind up in the news for potentially lethal anal taser mishaps.
I don't normally like these kinds of videos, but this one is pretty well done, more funny and painless and only half as long as sitting through Joe's special.
Offline
Why wait a year to celebrate the 40th anniversery of Pee Wee's Big Adventure? Lots of nostalgia, but this belongs here because everything - from the bad lip-synched music to the vintage commercials to David Lee Roth and Mr. T sharing the same chair as Exene Cervenka - is hilarious. And, really, Lindsey Buckingham's hair is perhaps the best laugh of them all.
Offline
Donald Trump is asking Theo Von about cocaine abuse.
What a fucking world.
Offline
Somebody at 800 Pound Gorilla Media seems to have a keen eye for talent.
Offline
The Bill Burr-hosted SNL this week was pretty mediocre stuff. I know that's par for the show on the best days, but being Burr coming on the post-election show, there was some hope for inspiration. The above commercial parody is about as good as you got. There's also some background context to take into account.
These "post-election" SNL's have only started to become a thing since 2016, when Dave Chappelle hosted and gave a classic monologue about salving the disappointment of Trump's win, trying to give him the benefit of the doubt, not losing sight of the big picture, etc, all while being damn funny. Dave doing what Dave does. And for every post-election show since (including mid-terms), Dave Chappelle has returned to make these shows a tradition. So this year was the first non-Chappelle post-election show, and expectations were that Burr would pick up the mantle and deliver an equally poignant episode. Well, he didn't, and didn't really seem to want to, and furthermore there didn't seem to be much appetite at the show itself to do anything that might ruffle Trump's or his supporters' feathers. Burr's monolgue did have some sharp quips, and some of the sharper ones seem to have gone over the audience's heads (hint: RFK Jr doesn't wear shoes on airplanes), but Burr made it clear immediately that he didn't want to get too political, and even when he did he kept it pretty tame. I was hoping he might do a variation of his riff about blaming immigrants for all of America's problems, but the subject was never broached.
There's some deeper context as well, which is that Lorne Michaels has a special relationship with Trump. You may remember that he allowed then-candidate Trump to host the show in 2015 - which is unprecedented. Candidates from both parties have appeared on the show during their capaign runs, but a presidential candidate has never hosted the show before or since. (Funny enough, at the time there was no talk about "equal airtime", such as we saw this year after Kamala appeared briefly on the show, and Trump forced NBC to give him a 10 minute block of time to compensate.)
Like most of the real elites in this country, Lorne Michaels has known and been preparing for a Trump victory for several weeks now, which is why he chose to have Chappelle replaced for this post-election episode, and quite likely why the show - even with the veneer or sarcasm - went much more lightly on the president-elect than in '16 and '20. Far more troubling in my opinion is the news that Lorne Michaels had asked comedian Shane Gillis to appear on the show throughout the season's run to do an impression of Donald Trump. This is appalling for a couple of reasons. First of all, the current Trump impressionist on the show, James Austin Johnson, happens to be the finest Trump impressionist available at the moment. It would have been an absolute insult to ask him to step down for what is pretty objectively a far weaker rendition (you are free to decide for yourselves). But the obvious truth is that Michaels did not ask Gillis to play Trump because anyone honestly thought he was better than Johnson, but because Gillis, being part of the Joe Rogan clique of comedians, would have been far more ingratiating to Trump, and likewise this shows Michaels' wish to ingratiate himself as well. (Thankfully for Johnson, Gillis still harbors some resentment for getting fired from SNL back in 2018.)
How much of the tepid satire on this week's SNL has to do with Michaels' - like so many other media elites - wish to avoid Donald's vengeful wrath in his new administration that happens to be armed with a fully weaponized Justice Department, well, who knows?
Offline
Today's Onion headline of "Years of Inbreeding Causes Dog To Give Birth to British Man" made me laugh pretty good.
Offline
crumbsroom wrote:
Today's Onion headline of "Years of Inbreeding Causes Dog To Give Birth to British Man" made me laugh pretty good.
Offline
I've decided to follow Vera Drew, director of People's Joker, on Letterboxd. I thought her movie was pretty good, but I'm more impressed with her perfect and personal appreciation of Texas Chainsaw Massacre.
"It’d give me a lot of gender euphoria if Leatherface lifted me up onto a hook. Then I could just watch him do his cute little crafts all day long
Made me laugh.
And if you don't already know, I think this thread is going to log anything I laugh at from here on in, until the end of the world.
See you in a couple of weeks.