Plato Shrimp

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



6/21/2025 10:26 pm  #1101


Re: Recently Seen

Rock wrote:

Enjoyed that one quite a bit Always nice when a Netflix original turns out to be a real movie.

It's also good that the film is much better than Saulnier's previous Netflix effort, Hold The Dark, which hopefully was more of an aberration.  Rebel Ridge is closer to Blue Ridge and Green Room in action/suspense.


 

6/22/2025 8:51 am  #1102


Re: Recently Seen




To belie the notion of Questlove's Summer of Soul as the "Black Woodstock", we can see with this film, restored and re-released after 50 years, as well as films such as WattsStax and Soul II Soul, there are several worthy candidates of concert films of the era that might better qualify for that title.  And, not insignificantly, it helps when these vintage concert films respect the artists enough not to constantly interrupt their musical performances with banal nostalgia.  And of course it also helps when you have a massive amount of talent - Marvin Gaye, Curtis Mayfield, Jackson 5, Staple Singers, Temptations, Roberta Flack, Isaac Hayes, Bill Withers, Nancy Wilson, The O'Jays, Cannonball Adderley and even Sammy Davis Jr, among several others.  This film, a product of Jesse Jackson's PUSH (People United to Save Humanity) campaign, also includes fascinating documentary footage of black culture (especially the children) of 1972 Chicago interspersed with the nearly non-stop and priceless music, creating a truly socially immersive testament to black life and spirit.

9/10
 


     Thread Starter
 

6/25/2025 8:46 pm  #1103


Re: Recently Seen




I have absolutely no basis for the theory, but my impression is that this film might represent the ancient rivalry between the Phoenicians (Korda/del Toro) and the Hebrew/Israelites (Nubar/Cumberbatch) with Liesl (Christianity/Threapleton) as the uncertain daughter of either.  Either way, this is probably Wes Anderson's most religious, however indirect, film to date.

8.5/10





David Cronenberg may have largely given up the penchant for 'body horror' but he still remains dedicatedly morbid.  This film involves a tech-cemetary where you can observe a body of a loved one while they decompose, thanks to a new invention called a "shroud".  The inventor, Vincent Cassel, represents Cronenberg himself, who recently lost his wife to cancer.  This film is his processing of that grief.  The film is also oblique and cryptic, and at least a couple of the characters are probably not real, and probably maybe even agents of malicious interests.  I won't get into all of that.  What matters is that Cronenberg's grieving process clearly involves his signature obsessions with carnal degradation and vague paranoia.  Which is never less than fascinating.

8/10
 


     Thread Starter
 

7/06/2025 11:38 am  #1104


Re: Recently Seen




While I await the opportunity to see the new Pee Wee doc, I figured I would also use the time to catch up on this, the last Pee Wee movie, some 30 years removed from his other movies, and dropped on Netflix with little fanfare.  The film appears to be largely well-received however, I would suppose out of mostly nostalgic sentiment, and I'm sure it will only be more fondly seen in light of Reuben's death.

While the film can't possibly live up to the manic inventiveness of his Big Adventure, or the zany brilliance of his initial HBO live show, this film, after a slow start (virtually an imitation of Big Adventure's Rube Goldberg opening), has enough sufficiently weird and silly moments to keep it amusing, and only gets better the weirder and sillier it gets.

But the problem is with Pee Wee himself.  The fact is that the persona simply doesn't age very well, and 65-year-old Reubens, despite all of the digital de-aging and yet still very obvious cake make-up, doesn't have the same slaphappy smart-ass spunk as in his giddy youth, and his more muted performance comes off as kind of sad instead.  Pee Wee was always an outsider ("a loner...a rebel") but not with so much pathos, uncomfortable in the role.  Maybe this was all Reubens' intention after all.  But I happen to agree with Reubens when he says that the character "doesn't work, to me, with age mixed into it".  I don't think the older character works for me either, and there's no amount of CGI that can fix that.

7/10
 


     Thread Starter
 

7/11/2025 9:50 pm  #1105


Re: Recently Seen




This seems like Zeppelin's attempt to establish a legacy document on par with the Beatles Anthology, and indeed this feels more like a "part one" of an eventual possible trilogy, focusing on the band's formation and early success, setting up for a future installment covering their mid-70s peak and finally one covering their late 70s tragedies (Plant's son's death, Page's descent into heroin abuse, Bonham's death, etc).  Whether or not this is the overall ambition isn't clear, but this film's success may inspire such follow-ups.  This is another 'talking head' style documentary, but fortunately the heads in question are largely limited to the band members themselves, with a minimum of superfluous social commentary.  Of course, the film is also highly curated in a lot of ways - no menton of Page's theft of "Dazed and Confused" from Jake Holmes, no "mud shark" tales.  But the real draw is in the excellent uncovered concert footage, generously featured in long segments with optimal remastering.

8.5/10



Intended as a possible TV special, this full-length 1974 concert shot on video, during Zappa's period of flirting with jazz-fusion (Roxy and Elsewhere, One Size Fits All, etc), the band is pretty phenomenal, Zappa's guitar work is always striking.  About the only problem is the common Zappa problem, which is that the band, however obviously capable, is never quite allowed to really cook, because as soon as they find a groove, Zappa changes it up, using his patented goofy structures and obtuse time signatures, and, for those musical technicians impressed with such things, the band never misses a cue, a feat of stamina and skill, but still.  This era has Zappa's blackest band, and he's got them playing parodies of renaissance lieder.  Some people find Zappa's smugness to be insufferable, and his sarcasm here won't win any of those folks over.  Also, deducted a half-point for not playing "Stinkfoot", which is more of a personal issue for me.  The band is still awesome though.

7.5/10
 


     Thread Starter
 

7/11/2025 10:32 pm  #1106


Re: Recently Seen

I was more than happy with Becoming Led Zeppelin focusing on the musical elements of the band. Don't get me wrong, I also would like one that shows all the other good stuff outside of that, but I'm more than happy having it streamline on the band talking about how they came together and made records and detail all of their creative decisions. Sounds good to me. And that live footage, which really was most of the movie, is all great.

But I just didn't like it as a movie. I found myself annoyed by how little the filmmakers were actually doing. And, maybe in their defence, you don't need to do that much when you've got a lot of worthwhile footage of Zeppelin music and interviews.

But the fact that I felt I would have been just as happy stumbling upon each of those clips seperately on YouTube, and didn't find the way the filmmakers put them together to add much beyond linearity to the experience, I just couldn't get behind the thing.
 

 

7/11/2025 10:35 pm  #1107


Re: Recently Seen

Hard recommend to the movie Invention. 

Plus I'm in love with the lead actress.

 

7/11/2025 10:57 pm  #1108


Re: Recently Seen

crumbsroom wrote:

Hard recommend to the movie Invention. 

Plus I'm in love with the lead actress.

Duly noted.

I need an illegal MUBI password....


     Thread Starter
 

7/15/2025 7:52 pm  #1109


Re: Recently Seen

Waiting for JJ's review of Daaaaaalí!

You can feel the love in this one, right from the opening shots in their faithful attention to detail. I think the interior of Dalí's home might be an exact reproduction from existing photos and footage. Some backwards shots are also Dalí–inspired, reminiscent of that Soft Self–Portrait mentioned in our Missing Movie Files.

I suspect Dupieux was channeling through the main character his own trepidation over such a colossal undertaking as making the larger–than–life figure, and clearly personal hero, the subject of his film. But if so then we see Dupieux doing his best to own it rather than let it get the better of him. It's the first Dupieux movie I've seen that isn't entirely comedy. It's definitely funny, but it's also deep. Incroyable mais Vrais was dipping its toes in the deeper end, but this is the plunge.

And that actor who plays Dalí, oh my fucking god, he is so perfect for the role. I mean he fucking kills it. He is this movie. You'd think Dalí himself had come back from the grave. His entrance is one of my favorite moments in the film. Or should I say favorite sequences. But I've said enough. I could say more, but I tend to be obsessively tight–lipped when talking about new movies unless I know that all in present company have also seen them. Beyond a vicious aversion to spoilers, I don't even like to risk coloring people's general expectations. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with that, it's just a personal hangup. 

Last edited by Rampop II (7/15/2025 7:55 pm)

 

7/15/2025 11:02 pm  #1110


Re: Recently Seen

Rampop II wrote:

And that actor who plays Dalí, oh my fucking god, he is so perfect for the role. I mean he fucking kills it. He is this movie. You'd think Dalí himself had come back from the grave.

There's five actors playing Dali, lol.

Rampop II wrote:

His entrance is one of my favorite moments in the film.

That was Edouard Baer, probably the best Dali among them.  Definitely a bit of 'Lancelot' in Holy Grail vibe here.




Quentin Dupieux is definitely under the influence of the cult Salvador Dali documentary, A Soft Self Portrait, a project undertaken by Orson Welles only to be taken over by Dali himself, much to Welles' amusement.  Dupieux's Dali (all five of the actors portraying him) inhabits a similar incorrigible tyranny, the irresistable compulsion to define himself in only the most precise sense, however senselessly, complete with faithful renderings of Dali's own personally invented vernacular and dialect.  Salvador Dali is a fundamentally absurdist construct, a carefully self-aware projection of the violently creative id, and Dupieux is wise to avoid any of the biographical conventions, much as Dali himself dispensed with the conventions of documentary filmmaking, and simply embraced Dali in all of his wild, vibrantly conflicted idiosyncrasies, with a non-linear, impulsively restless narrative style, lots of self-serious silliness and unreliable whimsy.  There's even some dashes of poignancy, and a totally sincere commitment to the beauty of it all.

9/10


 


     Thread Starter
 

7/15/2025 11:33 pm  #1111


Re: Recently Seen



Here's a later Brian DePalma film I hadn't prioritized, although I have seen the French film, Love Crimes, of which it is a remake.  Generally I prefer Love Crimes, even if the director Alain Corneau isn't nearly as sensual in style as DePalma.  No offense to the respective actresses, but I found the power dynamic between Kristin Scott Thomas and Ludivine Sagnier to be more convincing.  (Love Crimes is also blessed with a Pharoah Sanders soundtrack.)  As sensual as DePalma can still be, his bag of tricks appear exhausted, although this film is no where near the self-parody of Black Dahlia or Snake Eyes.  It's a pretty good erotic-corporate thriller, and these aren't easy to come by anymore.

7.5/10


Jinnistan wrote:

...these aren't easy to come by anymore.

To wit....




Say, did you know that Al Pacino and Anthony Hopkins did a film together a few years ago?  Me neither!  I wonder why?  Probably because it's such a piece of shit, it was immediately dumped in Redbox machines.  After the checks cleared, everyone went on their merry way, never to look back, and the best we can all hope is that the writers for this trash - the kind of film whose plot heavily depends on everyone doing the dumbest possible things at all times - will be as equally quickly forgotten from the business.

3/10
 


     Thread Starter
 

7/16/2025 12:13 pm  #1112


Re: Recently Seen

Jinnistan wrote:

There's five actors playing Dali, lol.
...
That was Edouard Baer, probably the best Dali among them. 
 

See, I knew you would know which one I was talking about. 😉

 

7/16/2025 9:32 pm  #1113


Re: Recently Seen

I’ve mostly avoided Pacino’s paycheque roles, but I did watch Righteous Kill recently, and he’s better in it than De Niro, for what it’s worth. Awful movie though.


I am not above abusing mod powers for my own amusement.
 

7/16/2025 10:42 pm  #1114


Re: Recently Seen


I don't know how great a movie this is, but it's volatile and that's always good.
 

 

7/17/2025 5:11 pm  #1115


Re: Recently Seen

Rock wrote:

I’ve mostly avoided Pacino’s paycheque roles, but I did watch Righteous Kill recently, and he’s better in it than De Niro, for what it’s worth. Awful movie though.

I'd rather have watched Pacino or Hopkins in one of those chimpanzee movies instead.  Al and Clyde maybe with an orangutan could have been a classic.  Even DeNiro.  He already starred with Zac Efron.  Are we going to split hairs here?


     Thread Starter
 

7/17/2025 5:18 pm  #1116


Re: Recently Seen

Rampop II wrote:

See, I knew you would know which one I was talking about. 😉

And Anais Demoustier is such a darling.  Or daaaaaaaalING.


     Thread Starter
 

7/17/2025 8:48 pm  #1117


Re: Recently Seen

Jinnistan wrote:

Rock wrote:

I’ve mostly avoided Pacino’s paycheque roles, but I did watch Righteous Kill recently, and he’s better in it than De Niro, for what it’s worth. Awful movie though.

I'd rather have watched Pacino or Hopkins in one of those chimpanzee movies instead.  Al and Clyde maybe with an orangutan could have been a classic.  Even DeNiro.  He already starred with Zac Efron.  Are we going to split hairs here?

Dirty Grandpa is probably one of his better movies overall the last 20 years lol

He’s much better in it than in Righteous Kill

Can’t stress how bad Righteous Kill is


I am not above abusing mod powers for my own amusement.
 

7/25/2025 10:45 pm  #1118


Re: Recently Seen



Very intriguing meta-horror, somewhat in the vein of Berberian Sound Studio, a period piece set in the periphery of the filmmaking industry - here involving a film censor in the '80s Britain "video nasty" era, and first-time director Prano Bailey-Bond manages a similar hyper-real neo-giallo tone as Peter Strickland, which plays with character/audience perceptions of fantasy/reality.  This censor, Enid (Niamh Algar), seems deceptively prudish and ascetic, an uncomfortable fit for the garish gore she's assigned to watch and edit, but we learn early on that she is motivated by her own guilt complex surrounding her missing sister, so her tireless viewing takes on a self-flaggelating quality.  She soon begins to see what she perceives as similarities in some of these banned horror films and her sister's case, and decides to investigate into whether these filmmakers might have been responsible or whether her sister is still alive.

If that synopsis sounds a bit spoilery, don't worry.  You don't know the half of it.  And even if what follows veers very closely into going completely off the rails, to the point of not satisfactorily sticking its landing, I still have to applaud the effort.

8/10




I know I probably should have learned my lesson about watching these recent unknown movies with legendary actors collecting retirement checks, but this 2019 film, Into the Labyrinth, with a seemingly unashamed Dustin Hoffman, starts off promising enough.  Its gambit of psychological gamemanship is contrived, but writer-director Donato Carrisi is competent enough to again give the film a type of neo-giallo vibe.  The story is split between a private investigator (Toni Servillo, an accomplished actor I'm familiar with from his Paolo Sorrentino films) trying to track down a kidnapper, and Dustin Hoffman as a psychologist attempting to rehabilitate a recently recovered victim of the same kidnapper.  As the conclusion becomes increasingly predictable, it's like Carrisi lost confidence, and the film ends up far too much of a total farce (doubt that was completely intentional) to recommend it.  Has some good scenes, but ultimately deflates into nonsense.

6/10




A film about a severed hand that communicates with dead spirits and causes demonic possession which, for some dumbass reason, teenagers use as a party favor like some kind of Ouija board.

This is a very popular A24 film with a ton of good reviews, all of which I find baffling.  The above set-up, etablished within about 15 minutes, is enough for me to loose any good faith respect for a film which is clearly expecting us to take very seriously.  Outside of the contrivances of its plot, the filmmaking is stale, that kind of "trendy" which has already immediately dated it.  Same old jump scares and moldy corpses, only now with more Gen Z signifiers.  And I'm not really impressed with reviews (most of which have been quite kind) that finds exceptional resonance in the film's pillar themes of grief and trauma.  That is not exactly fresh ground anymore - in fact every film in this post involves grief and trauma to some extent.  That's not going to be enough when the film is this silly.

5/10




Turns out rich people are still horrible human beings.  Another film which is more concerned with its generational marketing than being a successful thriller.  Although I wouldn't say that first-time director Zoe Kravitz is completely unskilled, there is nonetheless a vanity aspect to the production.  However hard it tries, it should be noted that this is not an A24 film, an understandable mistake.  And the actual A24 companion to this film would likely be Bodies Bodies Bodies, which also involved a rich-guy drug party turned into a horror film, only that film was more self-conscious of how silly the whole scenario is.  If this film, Blink Twice, truly wanted to veer fully into Jeffery Epstein territory (notably, the film blinks on that bluff), then maybe we'd have something truly provocative on our hands.  Instead, this film is just exploitating the glamour and envy of the predatory rich.

4/10
 


     Thread Starter
 

7/26/2025 11:39 am  #1119


Re: Recently Seen

Censor is a movie that generally gets lukewarm to negative reviews (frequently, from what I remember, for being derivative of other, better films), and Talk to Me was generally approved of. 

As usual, unsurprising when it turns out the consensus is wrong about both.

 

7/26/2025 5:34 pm  #1120


Re: Recently Seen

crumbsroom wrote:

Censor is a movie that generally gets lukewarm to negative reviews (frequently, from what I remember, for being derivative of other, better films), and Talk to Me was generally approved of. 

As usual, unsurprising when it turns out the consensus is wrong about both.

Censor seems to be well reviewed (89% on Rotten Tomatoes) although the average is minimal (7.30/10).  Talk To Me is overall better (94% - 7.7/10).  I didn't take any of this into account, but I'd heard positive things about both.

I didn't go into Talk To Me with any desire to ridicule it.  It was a sincere disappointment.


     Thread Starter
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum